Lade...
Publikationstyp
Forschungsbericht
Monographie
Monographie
Erscheinungsjahr
evaluation of the commission proposal ; interim report
Autor:innen
Meyer-Ohlendorf, Nils
Siemons, Anne
Schneider, Lambert
Herausgeber
Quelle
Schlagwörter
Kohlendioxidentfernung, Gütekriterien, carbon removal certification framework, EU climate policies, carbon dioxide removal, certification schemes, certification process, certification methodologies, quality criteria
Förderkennzeichen (FKZ)
3722425150
Forschungskennzahl
42
Zitation
Meyer-Ohlendorf, N., Siemons, A., & Schneider, L. (2023). Certification of carbon dioxide removals (Deutschland. Umweltbundesamt, ed.). Umweltbundesamt. https://doi.org/10.60810/openumwelt-2937
Zusammenfassung deutsch
Am 30. November 2022 schlug die Kommission eine EU-Verordnung für die Zertifizierung von CO2-Entnahme (CRCF) vor. Die vorgeschlagene Verordnung könnte die Umweltintegrität der EU Klimapolitik gefährden. Dieses Risiko wird dadurch verstärkt, dass sich die EU nicht auf die Rolle von Kohlenstoffentnahme für die Zeit nach 2030 geeinigt hat. Dieser Bericht bewertet den Vorschlag der Kommission für das CRCF. Der Bericht gibt einen Überblick über die Hauptelemente des Vorschlags und bewertet sie. Zu den Bewertungskriterien gehören, (1) ob der Vorschlag die EU-Klimapolitik stärkt, (2) ob er die Umweltintegrität wahrt, (3) ob er zu einer starken Umweltpolitik beiträgt und (4) ob er andere für Kohlenstoffentnahme relevante Aspekte berücksichtigt, wie Energieverbrauch, Kosteneinsparungen, Innovationen und gesellschaftliche Akzeptanz. Quelle: Forschungsbericht
Zusammenfassung englisch
On 30 November 2022, the Commission proposed an EU carbon removal certification framework (CRCF). The proposed framework could undermine the environmental integrity of EU climate policies. This risk is aggravated by the fact that the EU has not agreed on the role of removals for the time past the year 2030. This report assesses the Commissionâ€Ìs proposal for the CRCF and discusses interlinkages of the CRCF with other pieces of EU climate law. The report provides an overview of the proposalâ€Ìs main elements and assesses them. Criteria for assessment include (1) whether the proposal strengthens EU climate policies, (2) whether it safeguards the integrity of climate policies, (3) whether it contributes to strong environmental policies and (4) whether it takes account of other aspects relevant for the uptake of carbon removals, such as energy consumption, cost saving, and innovations Quelle: Forschungsbericht
Organisationseinheiten
Übersetzungen
Verbundene Publikation
Assumptions on potentials for Carbon Dioxide Removals in the EU: https://openumwelt.de/handle/123456789/10368
Scientific support for the design of a certification framework for Carbon Dioxide Removals in the EU
(Umweltbundesamt, 2025)
This report summarizes the results of the research project “Scientific support for the design of an EU Carbon Removal Certification Framework” that provided support to national policy makers during the CRCF negotiation process.
Short typology of carbon dioxide removals
(Umweltbundesamt, 2023)
On 30 November 2022, the Commission proposed a voluntary EU carbon removal certification framework (CRCF) in order to promote carbon dioxide removal (CDR) through natural and technical approaches and spur investments into the respective technologies. This paper analyzes CDR typologies, compares them to CDR in the CRCF and identifies room for improvements. The aim is to stimulate the public debate by highlighting key aspects and implications of CDR activities that should be taken into account in implementing the framework and in future CDR policy-making. Quelle: umweltbundesamt.de
Sustainability criteria for carbon dioxide removals
(Umweltbundesamt, 2024)
In November 2022, the European Commission put forward a proposal for a regulation for a Carbon Removal Certification Framework (CRCF). The principles laid out in the CRCF proposal of the European Commission and the proposed amendments by Council and European Parliament set minimum sustainability criteria. They are vague and require specification into executable criteria for certification. This report examines the robustness of the sustainability criteria included in the CRCF proposal and discuss different concepts for sustainability criteria. Quelle: www.umweltbundesamt.de