Vorschaubild nicht verfügbar
Publikationstyp
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
Erscheinungsjahr
2022
'http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/'

Risk assessment of dietary exposure to organophosphorus flame retardants in children by using HBM-Data

Autor:innen
Plichta, Veronika
Steinwider, Johann
Herausgeber
Quelle
Toxics
10 (2022), Heft 5
Schlagwörter
Zitation
PLICHTA, Veronika, Marike KOLOSSA-GEHRING, Johann STEINWIDER, Nina VOGEL und Till WEBER, 2022. Risk assessment of dietary exposure to organophosphorus flame retardants in children by using HBM-Data. Toxics [online]. 2022. Bd. 10 (2022), Heft 5. DOI 10.60810/openumwelt-449. Verfügbar unter: https://openumwelt.de/handle/123456789/2766
Zusammenfassung englisch
Due to their extensive usage, organophosphorus flame retardants (OPFRs) have been detected in humans and in the environment. Human are exposed to OPFRs via inhalation of indoor air, dust uptake or dietary uptake through contaminated food and drinking water. Only recently, few studies addressing dietary exposure to OPFRs were published. In this study, we used human biomonitoring (HBM) data of OPFRs to estimate how much the dietary intake may contribute to the total exposure. We estimated by reverse dosimetry, the daily intake of tris (2-chloroethyl) phosphate (TCEP), tris (1-chloro-2-propyl) phosphate (TCIPP), tris (1,3-dichloro-2-propyl) phosphate (TDCIPP) for children using HBM data from studies with sampling sites in Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Slovenia and Slovakia. For estimating the dietary exposure, a deterministic approach was chosen. The occurrence data of selected food categories were used from a published Belgium food basket study. Since the occurrence data were left-censored, the Lower bound (LB)-Upper bound (UB) approach was used. The estimated daily intake (EDI) calculated on the basis of urine metabolite concentrations ranged from 0.03 to 0.18 (micro)g/kg bw/d for TDCIPP, from 0.05 to 0.17 (micro)g/kg bw/d for TCIPP and from 0.02 to 0.2 (micro)g/kg bw/d for TCEP. Based on national food consumption data and occurrence data, the estimated dietary intake for TDCIPP ranged from 0.005 to 0.09 (mircro)g/kg bw/d, for TCIPP ranged from 0.037 to 0.2 (mirco)g/kg bw/d and for TCEP ranged from 0.007 to 0.018 (mirco)g/kg bw/d (summarized for all countries). The estimated dietary intake of TDCIPP contributes 11-173% to the EDI, depending on country and LB-UB scenario. The estimated dietary uptake of TCIPP was in all calculations, except in Belgium and France, above 100%. In the case of TCEP, it is assumed that the dietary intake ranges from 6 to 57%. The EDI and the estimated dietary intake contribute less than 3% to the reference dose (RfD). Therefore, the estimated exposure to OPFRs indicates a minimal health risk based on the current knowledge of available exposure, kinetic and toxicity data. We were able to show that the dietary exposure can have an impact on the general exposure based on our underlying exposure scenarios. © 2022 by the authors