Vorschaubild nicht verfügbar
Publikationstyp
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
Erscheinungsjahr
2013
Low dose effects and non-monotonic dose responses for endocrine active chemicals: Science to practice workshop: Workshop summary
Low dose effects and non-monotonic dose responses for endocrine active chemicals: Science to practice workshop: Workshop summary
Autor:innen
Herausgeber
Quelle
Chemosphere
93 (2013), H. 6, Seite 847-856
93 (2013), H. 6, Seite 847-856
Schlagwörter
Niedrigdosiseffekt, Risikoanalyse
Forschungskennzahl (FKZ)
Verbundene Publikation
Zitation
Low dose effects and non-monotonic dose responses for endocrine active chemicals: Science to practice workshop: Workshop summary, 2013. Chemosphere [online]. Bd. 93 (2013), H. 6, Seite 847-856. DOI 10.60810/openumwelt-1517. Verfügbar unter: https://openumwelt.de/handle/123456789/9233
Zusammenfassung englisch
A workshop was held in Berlin September 12-14th 2012 to assess the state of the science of the data supporting
low dose effects and non-monotonic dose responses (´´low dose hypothesis) for chemicals with
endocrine activity (endocrine disrupting chemicals or EDCs). This workshop consisted of lectures to present
the current state of the science of EDC action and also the risk assessment process. These lectures
were followed by breakout sessions to integrate scientists from various backgrounds to discuss in an
open and unbiased manner the data supporting the ´´low dose hypothesis. While no consensus was
reached the robust discussions were helpful to inform both basic scientists and risk assessors on all
the issues. There were a number of important ideas developed to help continue the discussion and
improve communication over the next few years.
Quelle: 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
low dose effects and non-monotonic dose responses (´´low dose hypothesis) for chemicals with
endocrine activity (endocrine disrupting chemicals or EDCs). This workshop consisted of lectures to present
the current state of the science of EDC action and also the risk assessment process. These lectures
were followed by breakout sessions to integrate scientists from various backgrounds to discuss in an
open and unbiased manner the data supporting the ´´low dose hypothesis. While no consensus was
reached the robust discussions were helpful to inform both basic scientists and risk assessors on all
the issues. There were a number of important ideas developed to help continue the discussion and
improve communication over the next few years.
Quelle: 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.