Publikation:
A review of methods and data to determine raw material criticality

dc.contributor.authorSchrijvers, Dieuwertje
dc.contributor.authorHool, Alessandra
dc.contributor.authorBlengini, Gian Andrea
dc.contributor.authorKosmol, Jan
dc.contributor.authorNuss, Philip
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-16T14:30:55Z
dc.date.available2024-06-16T14:30:55Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractThe assessment of the criticality of raw materials allows the identification of the likelihood of a supply disruption of a material and the vulnerability of a system (e.g. a national economy, technology, or company) to this disruption. Inconclusive outcomes of various studies suggest that criticality assessments would benefit from the identification of best practices. To prepare the field for such guidance, this paper aims to clarify the mechanisms that affect methodological choices which influence the results of a study. This is achieved via literature review and round table discussions among international experts. The paper demonstrates that criticality studies are divergent in the system under study, the anticipated risk, the purpose of the study, and material selection. These differences in goal and scope naturally result in different choices regarding indicator selection, the required level of aggregation as well as the subsequent choice of aggregation method, and the need for a threshold value. However, this link is often weak, which suggests a lack of understanding of cause-and-effect mechanisms of indicators and outcomes. Data availability is a key factor that limits the evaluation of criticality. Furthermore, data quality, including both data uncertainty and data representativeness, is rarely addressed in the interpretation and communication of results. Clear guidance in the formulation of goals and scopes of criticality studies, the selection of adequate indicators and aggregation methods, and the interpretation of the outcomes, are important initial steps in improving the quality of criticality assessments. © 2019 Published by Elsevier B.V.en
dc.format.extent1 Onlineressource (65 Seiten)
dc.format.mediumonline resource
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.60810/openumwelt-335
dc.identifier.urihttps://openumwelt.de/handle/123456789/4855
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.titleA review of methods and data to determine raw material criticality
dc.title.alternativeA review of methods and data to determine raw material criticality
dc.typeWissenschaftlicher Artikel
dc.type.dcmitext
dc.type.mediumcomputer
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.bibliographicCitation.journalTitleResources, Conservation and Recycling
local.bibliographicCitation.originalDOI10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104617
local.bibliographicCitation.volume155 (2020)
local.collectionAufsätze
local.contributor.authorId(DE-588)1103653113
local.contributor.authorId02183360
local.contributor.authorId(DE-588)143465104
local.contributor.authorId02183361
local.contributor.authorId(DE-588)1117942066
local.contributor.authorId02183362
local.contributor.authorId02181684
local.identifier.catalogId02470919
local.ingest.leader05631naa a2200000uu 4500
local.jointTitleA REVIEW OF METHODS AND DATA TO DETERMINE RAW MATERIAL CRITICALITY
local.sourcecatalog
local.staffPublicationtrue
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationddba4fba-f4b6-4e67-9bc9-a588d58b7636
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryddba4fba-f4b6-4e67-9bc9-a588d58b7636
Dateien
Sammlungen