Person: Kirst, Ingo
Lade...
E-Mail-Adresse
Geburtsdatum
Forschungsvorhaben
Organisationseinheiten
Berufsbeschreibung
Nachname
Kirst
Vorname
Ingo
Name
6 Ergebnisse
Suchergebnisse
Gerade angezeigt 1 - 6 von 6
Veröffentlichung Waters in Germany(2017) Arle, Jens; Blondzik, Katrin; Claussen, Ulrich; Duffek, Anja; Grimm, Sabine; Hilliges, Falk; Kirschbaum, Bernd; Kirst, Ingo; Koch, Dietmar; Koschorreck, Jan; Lepom, Peter; Leujak, Wera; Mohaupt, Volker; Naumann, Stephan; Rechenberg, Jörg; Schilling, Petra; Ullrich, Antje; Wellmitz, Jörg; Werner, Stefanie; Wolter, Rüdiger; Deutschland. UmweltbundesamtSince 2016, there are new legal requirements for the assessment for nutrients and substances of the waters in Germany. New assessment procedures for hydromorphology were developed. These assessment instruments are described in the brochure "Waters in Germany: Status and Assessment". The results of the assessment clarify the still open problems in water protection. The long time series of data for nitrate and phosphorus document the development of the nutrient load of groundwater, rivers, lakes and the North Sea and Baltic Sea. Until now, there are only a few data available for exposure to marine litter and underwater noise in the sea.Veröffentlichung Monitoring of Surface Waters in Germany under the Water Framework Directive ̶ A Review of Approaches, Methods and Results(2016) Arle, Jens; Kirst, Ingo; Mohaupt, VolkerThe European CommissionWater Framework Directive (WFD) was established 16 years agoand forms the current basis for monitoring surface waters and groundwater in Europe. This legislationresulted in a necessary adaptation of the monitoring networks and programs for rivers, lakes,and transitional and coastal waters to the requirements of the WFD at German and Europeanlevels. The present study reviews the most important objectives of both the monitoring of surfacewaters and the principles of the WFD monitoring plan. Furthermore, we look at the changes watermonitoring in Germany has undergone over the past sixteen years and we summarize monitoringresults from German surfaces waters under the WFD. Comparisons of European approaches forbiological assessments, of standards set for physical and chemical factors and of environmental quality standards for pollutants reveal the necessity for further European-wide harmonization. The objectiveof this harmonization is to improve comparability of the assessment of the ecological status of watersin Europe, and thus also to more coherently activate action programs of measures.
Quelle: Monitoring of Surface Waters in Germany under the Water Framework Directive - A Review of Approaches, Methods and Results / Jens Arle [Mitverf.] ; Volker Mohaupt [Mitverf.] ;Ingo Kirst [Mitverf.]. - 22 S.: graph. Darst., Kt. In: Water 2016, 8 (6).Veröffentlichung Recommendations for reducing micropollutants in waters(2018) Ahting, Maren; Brauer, Frank; Duffek, Anja; Ebert, Ina; Eckhardt, Alexander; Hassold, Enken; Helmecke, Manuela; Kirst, Ingo; Krause, Bernd; Lepom, Peter; Leuthold, Sandra; Mathan, Cindy; Mohaupt, Volker; Moltmann, Johann F.; Müller, Alexandra; Nöh, Ingrid; Pickl, Christina; Pirntke, Ulrike; Pohl, Korinna; Rechenberg, Jörg; Suhr, Michael; Thierbach, Claudia; Tietjen, Lars; von der Ohe, Peter C.; Winde, Christine; Deutschland. UmweltbundesamtResidues of medicinal products, pesticides, biozides and other chemicals can adversely affect the environment and human health already in low concentrations. These micropollutants are increasingly detected in our waters not least due to improved analytics. Precautionary measures are needed to prevent future stresses on our waterbodies. Therefore, the German Environment Agency (UBA) has analysed entry pathways, named critical substance characteristics and proposed a combination of measures consisting of measures at the source, in use and for wastewater treatment serving the objective of comprehensive water protection.Veröffentlichung Waters in Germany(2017) Arle, Jens; Blondzik, Katrin; Claussen, Ulrich; Duffek, Anja; Grimm, Sabine; Hilliges, Falk; Kirschbaum, Bernd; Kirst, Ingo; Koch, Dietmar; Koschorreck, Jan; Lepom, Peter; Leujak, Wera; Mohaupt, Volker; Naumann, Stephan; Rechenberg, Jörg; Schilling, Petra; Ullrich, Antje; Wellmitz, Jörg; Werner, Stefanie; Wolter, Rüdiger; Deutschland. UmweltbundesamtVeröffentlichung Gewässer in Deutschland(2017) Arle, Jens; Blondzik, Katrin; Claussen, Ulrich; Duffek, Anja; Grimm, Sabine; Hilliges, Falk; Kirschbaum, Bernd; Kirst, Ingo; Koch, Dietmar; Koschorreck, Jan; Lepom, Peter; Leujak, Wera; Mohaupt, Volker; Naumann, Stephan; Rechenberg, Jörg; Schilling, Petra; Ullrich, Antje; Wellmitz, Jörg; Werner, Stefanie; Wolter, Rüdiger; Deutschland. UmweltbundesamtSeit 2016 gibt es neue gesetzliche Vorgaben für die Bewertung der Gewässer hinsichtlich ihrer stofflichen Belastung. Und auch im Bereich der Hydromorphologie wurden und werden neue Bewertungsinstrumente entwickelt. In der Broschüre „Gewässer in Deutschland: Zustand und Bewertung“ sind diese Bewertungsinstrumente zusammengestellt. Ihre Anwendung verdeutlicht die noch offenen Probleme im Gewässerschutz. Der Vergleich der Daten für Nitrat und Phosphor über einen langen Zeitraum dokumentiert die Entwicklung der Nährstoffbelastung von Grundwasser, Fließgewässern, Seen und Nord- und Ostsee. Bei den Spurenstoffen werden immer wieder neue Verbindungen relevant. Für die Belastung mit Müll und Lärm im Meer liegen erst wenige Daten vor.Veröffentlichung Gewässer in Deutschland(2017) Arle, Jens; Blondzik, Katrin; Claussen, Ulrich; Duffek, Anja; Grimm, Sabine; Hilliges, Falk; Kirschbaum, Bernd; Kirst, Ingo; Koch, Dietmar; Koschorreck, Jan; Lepom, Peter; Leujak, Wera; Mohaupt, Volker; Naumann, Stephan; Rechenberg, Jörg; Schilling, Petra; Ullrich, Antje; Wellmitz, Jörg; Werner, Stefanie; Wolter, Rüdiger; Deutschland. Umweltbundesamt